← All answers

— For the restaurant operator, design partner, buyer, or investor

How proven is Never86'd for delivery-marketplace statement auditing?

What Never86'd has and has not proven

Foundations and proofField guide 15 of 52

Never86'd can address the first DoorDash statement-audit workflow today: one redacted finalized statement can produce a source-stamped explanation of what happened, what the evidence supports, what is missing, and the next action. No portal password or integration is required for that first useful answer. A sanitized 12-period case shows that the method can reconcile statement math and separate commission from restaurant-funded promotions, fees, and error charges. That case proves the method and the importance of cost composition; it does not establish a market-wide benchmark or guaranteed savings.

This is not yet commercially proven at scale. DoorDash is the strongest current pilot. Uber Eats and Grubhub are early-access validation tracks. Repeat paid behavior, deterministic coverage across statement formats, enterprise privacy and reliability, and scaled multi-location reporting still have to be demonstrated. Never86'd will not claim recovered cash, a contract violation, an overcharge, or guaranteed savings when the contract, fee base, payout record, or bank evidence needed for that conclusion is missing.

Test the bounded workflowUse redacted data. A missing-evidence result is a valid result.

Sources checked August 21, 2026. Independent operational guidance—not marketplace-endorsed legal, tax, or accounting advice. Read the evidence and corrections standard.