— Agent · for the CFO · CEO
Rate Card Audit.
Contract rule versus statement charge, with both sources attached.
A statement can show observed cost. A rate-card test needs the governing agreement and the correct fee base. We compare the two only when both are supplied and label the result unresolved when a required rule is missing.
— What it catches
The signals.
- •Signed or current rate rule tied to the correct store and period
- •Eligible-sales base used by the statement calculation
- •Observed charge compared with a reproducible expected charge
- •Unresolved status when the contract, fee base, or statement detail is missing
— Data it needs
The input.
The governing contract or current rate card plus a finalized marketplace statement for the same store and period.
— What you'll see
The output.
Expected rule · observed calculation · reproducible difference · evidence status · next record or action.
— Sample signal
Needs evidence: the statement shows the charge, but the governing fee base is missing. No overcharge claim is made.
— POS support
Works with your stack.
Restaurant-held agreement and marketplace statement
Don't see your POS? Drop a CSV at /trial — the parser auto-detects most column shapes. Or join the integration waitlist and we'll email you the moment the OAuth ships.